Re:If it's not practical to redistribute, it's not free soft...
by jerven on Monday November 23, 2015 @07:51AM
(#10614271)
That had everything to do with Canonical entanglement. Canonical would only accept patches to upstart with a contributor agreement allowing Canonical relicensing rights.
This made it very difficult for outside contributors to work on upstart (especially redhat funded ones) and that led to resources being made available for investigating what would become systemd and friends.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.