News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Slackware Live Edition by vezzy-fnord on Sunday November 22, 2015 @10:01AM (#10610221)
Lack of package management

There is no lack of package management. There is a lack of automatic dependency resolution without third-party additions. This is nowhere near as debilitating as often presented by outside observers who have never tried the distribution.

YMMV, but I've ran into circular dependencies and conflicts in addition to configuration updates rendering systems unbootable multiple times on distros like Debian with their non-transactional resolution heuristics that make your life easier, until they don't. Slackware's spartan package management has not failed me once, it's rock solid no matter how much you thrash your file system hierarchy. In addition, when I want to install SlackBuilds, I have never used a more convenient package manager than sbopkg before. Dependencies can be cleanly recorded and built with queuefiles.

Re:Slackware Live Edition by jsizz on Sunday November 22, 2015 @10:48AM (#10610381)
> I have never used a more convenient package manager than sbopkg before. Dependencies can be cleanly recorded and built with queuefiles.

http://idlemoor.github.io/slackrepo/index.html

Re:Slackware Live Edition by jqm on Sunday November 22, 2015 @10:51AM (#10610389)
So it does... I mispoke. But it isn't the same as yum or apt-get. (which is ok w/ me).