Re:Leap-second decision delayed by eight years
by blahedo on Saturday November 21, 2015 @07:27PM
(#10608582)
True, although for the same reasons that "fail fast" is sometimes better than the alternatives, a "leap hour"---being much easier to perceive than a leap second---may be easier to work with. At least then you'll know if someone's off because they didn't leap, vs some sort of clock drift or other error.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Leap-second decision delayed by eight years
by greglindahl on Saturday November 21, 2015 @08:28PM
(#10608696)
Wait - for "fail fast" reasons, we're going to do something important every few thousand years, instead of about once a year?!