Microsoft, Once Infested with Security Flaws, Does an About-Face

Re:Microsoft, Once Infested with Security Flaws, Does an Abo... by loginusername on Thursday November 19, 2015 @12:39AM (#10592958)

A well-deserved endorsement from a Microsoft employee. (Assuming your HN profile is up-to-date.)

The kernel I start with is indeed derived from the same one that project started with.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Microsoft, Once Infested with Security Flaws, Does an Abo... by chadzawistowski on Thursday November 19, 2015 @01:11PM (#10596388)

My profile is up-to-date, although maybe I should add the caveat that my opinions are merely my own. :)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Microsoft, Once Infested with Security Flaws, Does an Abo... by loginusername on Friday November 20, 2015 @12:11PM (#10602325)

Of course.

Though I'm sure you are not the only Microsoft employee who has used OpenBSD.

At one point, after the Danger acquisition, Microsoft HR was advertising a position for a NetBSD developer.

Are there any rules about using a non-Windows OS in the office? Even if it increases your capabilities and productivity?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Microsoft, Once Infested with Security Flaws, Does an Abo... by chadzawistowski on Monday November 23, 2015 @02:23PM (#10616625)

No, there aren't hard rules against it. Practically, however, it's not very useful to use a non-Windows OS depending on which team/product you're working with.

For instance, Macbooks are really common on some apps teams. In contrast, I work on the OS itself, so tools such as WinDBG and Hyper-V are essential to getting work done.

[ Parent | on HN ]