Re:A Back Door to Encryption Won't Stop Terrorists
by mc32 on Wednesday November 18, 2015 @05:34PM
(#10591262)
No idea, it's an opinion, however, many nations have suppressed many other nations and it's historically atypical for the aggrieved to lash out to others of indirect involvement. Have Congolese (after the conflict ended) gone and bombed Belgium, or why not Albania, who had no relation to Belgium's involvement?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A Back Door to Encryption Won't Stop Terrorists
by woah on Wednesday November 18, 2015 @06:18PM
(#10591466)
It's not about some abstract historical notion of right and wrong. The US has created an environment that fosters terrorism. Whether this is wronger or righter than any historical colonialism by other countries is completely irrelevant. We've created "the YC for terrorists" in the countries we have smashed in the Middle East, and now there is a lot of terrorism.
Re:A Back Door to Encryption Won't Stop Terrorists
by mc32 on Wednesday November 18, 2015 @06:49PM
(#10591624)
Ok, so what makes the ME react differently to meddling compared to SE Asia?
Re:A Back Door to Encryption Won't Stop Terrorists
by tareqak on Wednesday November 18, 2015 @07:11PM
(#10591743)
My first attempt at an answer would be the breadth and depth of the meddling involved.
That being said, could you provide examples as to how the Middle East has reacted to meddling as opposed to South East Asia?
Re:A Back Door to Encryption Won't Stop Terrorists
by mc32 on Thursday November 19, 2015 @11:29AM
(#10595674)
Look at Thailand, a land with many masters over the millennia, India, china, British, Japan. Yet there is only a certain faction involved in terrorism there, their society at large doesn't feel the need to engage in antiwestern terrorism.