Despite some flaws with the country, I'm very happy with my decision to have been born in the US.
> I'm very happy with my decision to have been born in the US.
What? you decided your country of birth?
Pssst, that's the sarcasm.
> One is denying the right of people born in the U.S. with parents that are citizens.
Umm, no. You are mistaken. Racial criteria also applied to naturalized citizenship aspirants. Today, once you have a green card, irrespective of where you were born, it takes you 5 or so years to get your citizenship. So, person of white ethnicity born in Switzerland and a non-white person born in India would have the same wait and the same criteria for citizenship. This was not possible before the INA act of 1965 (and other civil rights acts).
One is denying the right of people born in the U.S. with parents that are citizens.
The other, is limiting the number of people not born in the U.S. and without parents that are citizens. In other words, its a choice to come here.
Not saying it is morally right or wrong, but you may consider distinguishing between the two.