Re:Microsoft, Once Infested with Security Flaws, Does an Abo...
by loginusername on Wednesday November 18, 2015 @12:34PM
(#10589251)
Maybe Redhat's configuration was at fault?
I have seen popular Linux distributions where interfaces are enabled and have programs listening by default.
I, the user, never asked for that.
This is one reason I do not use Linux distributions.
Too many assumptions about what the user wants.
Re:Microsoft, Once Infested with Security Flaws, Does an Abo...
by wvenable on Wednesday November 18, 2015 @01:19PM
(#10589625)
You have to remember this was the 90's and it was a different time back then. I think there's a tendency to compare Windows in the 90s with how Linux is now. This was the same era as Mac OS 9 where a single application could still crash the entire system.
Exploiting common faults in Linux system software was pretty easy back then too.
From my perspective, Windows doesn't seem to be less secure but it has a greater share of users who do stupid things.