forgive me, i was unaware this was a semantic argument

i thought your issue was with coherence 'resolving' multiple routes simultaneously, specifically the simultaneous aspect

by using the word 'search' i was anything but suggesting that we should anthropomophise lightning, but i'd argue the article failed to do the same for light

i created an opportunity for you to lash out by using a vague term to simplify a description and i apologise to posterity for that

but you're derailing any substantial discussion on the science with a strawman

if you read the study the words: 'think','choose', and 'search'; are completely vacant from the paper.. you're projecting