i feel your comment is unnecessarily dismissive toward a healthy skepticism

if you can be the arbiter of said education then i'd suggest you educate wellyWellyWell, wWW, about Bell's Inequality and its innate response to wWW's comment

if i were to guess why you brought up Bell i'd guess it was because you read wWW's comment as suggesting classical mechanics can explain superposition with a robust enough measurement, but that Bell shows that classical mechanics are are too 'silly' to explain quantum mechanics?

i find that science as a verb often is the act of discovering previous understandings were inadequate to describe phenomena, yet pedantry is more often used to squelch skepticism stead stoke the flame of investigation