I'm not making any claims about the meaning. My point is that someone could use this quote to 'prove' that Christian people are inherently violent in the same way they use quotes from the Quran to 'prove' that Muslim people are inherently violent - and both are nonsense.

There is a difference between prediction of future violence and explicit call for violence.

Which of these you think can be easier used to "justify" violence?

What semantics of "inherently violent religion" do you propose such that "our founders told us to kill infidels" still doesn't cut it?

I see things like all the children physically, sexually, emotionally abused by priests and nuns in Catholic children's homes; or the Lord's Resistance Army using child soldiers and rape as a weapon of war; or the threats of violence to and the harassment (and bombings and shootings) of workers in abortion clinics, and so I'm going to say "the Bible?"

You seem like a Christian (sorry if I'm wrong) so I'll ask: What are you doing to stop the radical extremists of your religion from perpetrating these terrorist actions? What are you doing to stop the extremist elements of your religion from denying women their human rights? What are you doing to stop Christian soldiers using rape as a weapon of war?

Why am I wrong to ask you these questions but it's okay to ask everyday Muslims these questions?

I believe the discussion was about founders' beliefs and their influence.

As for the second part, I'm hardly a theist, so what I'm doing is not walking around and telling gullible people that they have been created by some god who now wants them to hunt infidels. Sometimes encouraging others to do the same.