News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Otto: Meet the Successor to Vagrant by smoyer on Saturday November 14, 2015 @09:41AM (#10565812)
"An Ansible alternative written in Go would be perfect."

Why?

I understand the allure of Go - I was an embedded systems engineer working predominately in assembly language and C for many years. Memory management was a pain and concurrency was practically non-existent on many uCs.

But Ansible is pretty mature at this point, with a vibrant community, lots of internal and third-party modules and it's based on a ubiquitous scripting language (Python).

Please help me understand the rationale of a rewrite - what are the goals, what deficit would if fix and would the time required be justified versus enhancing Ansible as it is. At best I'm a Go newb, but I'm pretty proficient with Python - if it's just that Ansible's "not in your language", I'd argue a rewrite represents a false economy.

Re:Otto: Meet the Successor to Vagrant by frik on Sunday November 15, 2015 @06:16AM (#10569294)
Why not?

> ubiquitous scripting language

Third party modules don't cover everything and then you have to write Python. Plus the config files of Docker are better. So I would welcome a modern Ansible alternative that requires just one executable instead of a full Python stack.