> I would argue that qualifying Tor as a group targeting world governments is a bit dramatic. That may be propagandist commentary on their part - they're entitled to make it, and people still use Tor in spite of it - but isn't the primary intention of Tor to preserve free speech and anonymity, and to offer protection from persecution (or prosecution) by nation-states that seek to quell dissent?

I don't understand what you're trying to say. Surely, if the primary intention of Tor is to protect users from persecution by nation-states, then their adversaries are world governments?