News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Paris Shootings and Explosions Kill Over 100, Police Say by Asbostos on Friday November 13, 2015 @10:14PM (#10564257)
You didn't need Facebook to tell you that. You could have just assumed it was true based on the enormous population of Paris (2 million) and the small number of deaths in this incident (100-200).
Re:Paris Shootings and Explosions Kill Over 100, Police Say by jacquesm on Friday November 13, 2015 @10:25PM (#10564295)
It's a matter of geometry and not loading up the phone lines with un-necessary calls.

If 1,000,000 people try to figure out whether the 1 person they know in a city of 2,000,000 are ok within a very short time-frame then the phone network will stop functioning.

A place to post a simple 'I'm ok' will cut down tremendously on the number of calls that will then still need to be made. Unfortunately (1) not everybody has facebook and (2) a 'no show' will now certainly lead to a phonecall when before it would be assumed the person was ok so I'm not sure whether it helps or not but the basic idea is probably a good one. It would be even better if this functionality was available outside of having a facebook account.

Re:Paris Shootings and Explosions Kill Over 100, Police Say by peferron on Friday November 13, 2015 @10:43PM (#10564340)
You would have 0.01% chance of being wrong. How high would it need to be to warrant, in your eyes, checking if your family members are alive, instead of assuming they are? 0.1%? 1%? 10%? And why?
Re:Paris Shootings and Explosions Kill Over 100, Police Say by ehnto on Saturday November 14, 2015 @01:09AM (#10564697)
The world is full of a mean average of people who, believe it or not, do not run statistical analysis before deciding if they should care for their loved ones.

The world is full of real people, with real understandable concerns for their families and friends.

Not only that, but it isn't about the number who were killed anyway. It is about the probability of your friend being in that location at the time of the disaster which is much, much higher.

No one thinks 'I wonder if Jack was killed, he was at that park today'. They think 'I wonder if Jack was in the CBD, he works nearby!'

Statistically validated concerns or not, the very real effect of this part of human nature is that the phone infrastructure goes down and that sucks for everyone.

Re:Paris Shootings and Explosions Kill Over 100, Police Say by peferron on Saturday November 14, 2015 @12:51PM (#10566519)
Did you read the post to which my reply was directed? I'm not addressing these questions to you or to one of the "people who do not run statistical analysis before deciding if they should care for their loved ones". I'm addressing these questions to someone who apparently does run statistical analysis.
Re:Paris Shootings and Explosions Kill Over 100, Police Say by ehnto on Saturday November 14, 2015 @09:13PM (#10568205)
Yes my apologies, I didn't realise I was commenting on the child comment. I was intending to reply to the comment you had replied to.
Re:Paris Shootings and Explosions Kill Over 100, Police Say by spellboots on Saturday November 14, 2015 @12:33PM (#10566458)
Assuming that humans will behave rationally is, in itself, quite irrational