News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How Apple Is Giving Design a Bad Name by oneeyedpigeon on Friday November 13, 2015 @09:02AM (#10559856)
This is why, for me, the iPod ('classic') remains one of the greatest products Apple created. They managed to get so much of it right, almost uniquely. Hardware and software working very well together. Of course, it had a very specific function, which makes the task much easier, but I just wish they could follow it up with something remotely approaching as nice an experience.
Re:How Apple Is Giving Design a Bad Name by jcranmer on Saturday November 14, 2015 @02:02PM (#10566748)
I've been wanting to replace my iPod Nanos for a few years now (they're 10 years old already, and the batteries are starting to go), but everything nowadays is touch-screen, and so completely unusable for me. Why? With that tactile single click-wheel, it was very easy for me to put the iPod in my pocket and not look at it for the entire flight, even when I wanted to skip the next song or replay or pause.
Re:How Apple Is Giving Design a Bad Name by will_pseudonym on Saturday November 14, 2015 @02:41PM (#10566920)
I know! Similarly, what I've been pining for are smart watches with several tactile buttons that can be used as input for apps. I've been waiting on programmable generic buttons for AGES. Having a display would be icing on the cake.
Re:How Apple Is Giving Design a Bad Name by semi-extrinsic on Saturday November 14, 2015 @03:24PM (#10567074)
FYI there is a big market for non-touch music players if you know where to look. Over at HeadFi [1] you can find a large amount of reviews and discussion of players from iRiver, Sandisk, Sony, together with more niche brands like Fiio and HiFiMAN.

[1] http://www.head-fi.org/products/category/digital-audio-flac-...

Re:How Apple Is Giving Design a Bad Name by unfamiliar on Saturday November 14, 2015 @07:21PM (#10567903)
Imo all they have to do to get the new music app to work is to copy-paste the old iPod user interface into the Music app and add a decent search field. I don't know why that's such a hard challenge for them.