Re:Google self-driving car pulled over for driving too slowly
by cmdrfred on Friday November 13, 2015 @01:20AM
(#10558290)
I'll bite, how does sending information vast distances instantly drive a car?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google self-driving car pulled over for driving too slowly
by adrianN on Friday November 13, 2015 @02:16AM
(#10558414)
Quantum entanglement doesn't really send information.
Re:Google self-driving car pulled over for driving too slowly
by DrScump on Friday November 13, 2015 @04:30AM
(#10558836)
"God doesn't play dice with traffic." - Einstein
Re:Google self-driving car pulled over for driving too slowly
by lechuga on Friday November 13, 2015 @01:23AM
(#10558299)
we're information
Re:Google self-driving car pulled over for driving too slowly
by TeMPOraL on Friday November 13, 2015 @01:39AM
(#10558325)
What if quantum waveforming magic turns out to be prohibitely expensive energy-wise? It may be that teleportation will be used between Earth and Mars, but self-driving cars will still roam the planet surface.
Re:Google self-driving car pulled over for driving too slowly
by lechuga on Friday November 13, 2015 @01:45AM
(#10558337)
earth and the rest of the inner solar system will be strip-mined for materials to build solar collectors and autonomous robots
Re:Google self-driving car pulled over for driving too slowly
by TeMPOraL on Friday November 13, 2015 @01:56AM
(#10558362)
Why would people want to build autonomous robots if they can quantum-entangle-apport anything anywhere?
But even if, replace "Mars" with "Neptune" and my point still stands. Also, autonomous cars are autonomous robots.
Re:Google self-driving car pulled over for driving too slowly
by brazzledazzle on Friday November 13, 2015 @05:38AM
(#10559071)
>Also, autonomous cars are autonomous robots
No, you wouldn't be able to reuse any of the technology built for cars. Didn't you hear? Careers will be ruined.