News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Six years of Go by geodel on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @08:59AM (#10539256)
"Getting things done" is quite accurate considering large number of popular Go projects in short time compared to allegedly better design languages ( Scala, Rust, Haskell, D, OCaml etc..)
Re:Six years of Go by junke on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @09:17AM (#10539361)
You are mixing productivity (getting things done), quality (better designed languages) and popularity (large number of projects) in the same sentence, but you generally cannot find causal links among them.
Re:Six years of Go by codygman on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @09:37AM (#10539505)
In Haskell a lot of it is due to people thinking they need to deeply understand everything before cranking out code. It's like trying to understand music theory before strumming some guitar strings... actually it's probably something less useful than that.

However, I guess the inability to deeply understand or pontificate about Go is an advantage in itself... forcing your only potential activity to be getting work done.

Also, are you sure that there are more popular Go projects than popular Scala projects?

Re:Six years of Go by RodericDay on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @09:15AM (#10539346)
That may also have to do with the massive push behind it.
Re:Six years of Go by Willyfrog on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @09:17AM (#10539360)
that would mean javascript is better than go for GTD ;)