Re:U.S. airlines have shifted maintenance work to developing...
by briandear on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @08:45AM
(#10539192)
Assuming they actually have that certification. That's the kicker. I am happy with certification by a reputable organization (FAA or EASS,) however we're assuming those certifications. Just because Lufthansa co-owns the venture doesn't mean they spent the money to send all of those mechanics to an accredited certification program. The Lufthansa CEO is known for being cheap -- he's on record complaining about (and initially refusing to install) full flat business class seats in the new A380s because of the lost revenue from the extra space they would have required. I fly Lufthansa about a dozen times per year and generally feel confident about maintanence, however if the reason for this is cost savings, there's a real danger of even minor communications issues becoming deadly.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:U.S. airlines have shifted maintenance work to developing...
by notahacker on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @09:32AM
(#10539473)
I'm going to go out on a limb and suppose that not sending many staff to the massive training facility they also own next door to ensure smooth operation of part of their $4bn per annum third party MRO business probably isn't on Lufthansa's cost- cutting list, and the airlines signing multimillion dollar contracts with them might be a little more informed and thorough in their due diligence on certifications and staffing than travel photographers trying their hand at journalism...
Re:U.S. airlines have shifted maintenance work to developing...
by ubernostrum on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @01:13PM
(#10541121)
Lufthansa's cost-cutting is kind of a big deal, at least for employees; their cabin crew staged a one-day strike Monday over that.