Re:The best cities to get ahead are often the most expensive...
by cozuya on Monday November 09, 2015 @02:27PM
(#10535192)
Not that I have any real comparison but I feel like our tech scene is pretty weak. While there are jobs, and companies, they are mostly monolithic fortune 500 dinosaurs. Who in tech wants to work for General Mills?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The best cities to get ahead are often the most expensive...
by DIVx0 on Monday November 09, 2015 @09:56PM
(#10537342)
Some of the mega corps do have some really cool work going on. It's not all rank-and-file development, I'm not even talking about R&D. The cities are fairly small compared to other larger midwest cities and if you have a decent reputation as someone who can deliver code or pick up good work there is plenty of opportunity to shine very brightly at a large org and have your pick of projects to tackle.
Fortune 500 aside, there are a lot of smaller startups in the cities. They mostly focus on creating products aimed at the health insurance industry though, which in my experience is fairly dull work.
Re:The best cities to get ahead are often the most expensive...
by jtbigwoo on Monday November 09, 2015 @04:25PM
(#10535945)
I agree and disagree. On the one hand, General Mills, Wells Fargo, and Target are never going to be as cutting-edge as Google. On the other hand, most jobs at Google aren't cutting-edge, either. The two guys I know at Google are doing stuff that's not that much different than your average line-of-business programmer.
I'd say availability of tech jobs in the "sort of interesting" category is great in MSP, but the truly amazing jobs are still rare.