News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The KeyKOS Nanokernel Architecture (1992) by agumonkey on Saturday November 07, 2015 @06:43PM (#10526715)
Predecessor of CoyoteOS and its famous BitC language https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coyotos
Re:The KeyKOS Nanokernel Architecture (1992) by ansible on Sunday November 08, 2015 @03:31AM (#10527958)
Famous? I was on all the mailing lists... there weren't many participants.

The way ahead, at least in the short term, seems to be containerized apps on top of Linux, as with Sandstorm:

https://sandstorm.io/

I don't know if we'll ever get back to the original vision of very fine-grained apps, with object-cap security baked into the language itself. It would be nice... that would provide another level of security beyond what any OS can provide.

Re:The KeyKOS Nanokernel Architecture (1992) by agumonkey on Sunday November 08, 2015 @04:19AM (#10528034)
Ha, well I wan't on the ML, and ok not mainstream famous but https://www.google.com/search?q=ltu+bitc yields a lot of discussion about it.
Re:The KeyKOS Nanokernel Architecture (1992) by nnn on Saturday November 07, 2015 @07:33PM (#10526828)
Here are some parts of the KeyKOS source code: http://css.csail.mit.edu/6.858/2011/readings/keykos/
Re:The KeyKOS Nanokernel Architecture (1992) by NormH on Wednesday November 11, 2015 @03:38PM (#10549105)
I wrote many of the Keykos papers and can answer most questions you might have. For instance, can sandstorm do confinement as described at http://cap-lore.com/CapTheory/Confine/ ?
Re:The KeyKOS Nanokernel Architecture (1992) by drallison on Saturday November 07, 2015 @04:43PM (#10526355)
This is an important paper and should be read by anyone contemplating the design of secure operating systems.
Re:The KeyKOS Nanokernel Architecture (1992) by nickpsecurity on Sunday November 08, 2015 @10:15AM (#10528678)
I agree. It's still more secure by design than any server OS in production today.
Re:The KeyKOS Nanokernel Architecture (1992) by nickpsecurity on Sunday November 08, 2015 @10:18AM (#10528686)
Excellent system that exemplified effective use of the capability model. Anyone aiming to learn or develop secure OS's should read on this plus look up the successor for x86, EROS by Shapiro. EROS had a secure kernel, persistance, robust network stack, and more secure GUI. Worth building on.

Note: Look up Coyotos kernel as they mention a few EROS attributes you might improve or change.

Re:The KeyKOS Nanokernel Architecture (1992) by vezzy-fnord on Saturday November 07, 2015 @04:13PM (#10526254)
Re:The KeyKOS Nanokernel Architecture (1992) by 885895 on Saturday November 07, 2015 @06:19PM (#10526627)
Proper archive version: https://archive.is/nlKS