Re:The first photograph of a human being (1838)
by vacri on Thursday November 05, 2015 @10:57PM
(#10517758)
They mention later in the article that the second figure is also visible, but much less distinct. The first figure is unmistakably a person, but if you remove the first figure, the second figure loses context and isn't so clear.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.