News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Startup Playbook by icelancer on Thursday November 05, 2015 @03:26PM (#10515909)
That's my business. 2 partners (me: President and Founder, partner: CEO who I hired), 4 employees, and 2-3 at-will contractors for sporadic work. Revenue barely $1MM but growing, probably to $4-5MM in 3 years. Really love what I do and happy to be out of the BS VC silicon valley groupthink crap.
Re:Startup Playbook by rcarrigan87 on Thursday November 05, 2015 @03:54PM (#10516049)
Do you mind sharing your company? I love these kind of stories.
Re:Startup Playbook by beachstartup on Friday November 06, 2015 @02:28AM (#10518226)
i run one like that too (a little further along) but i'll never mention the name here. there's no point, and it's risky. the other guy probably thinks the same. our businesses survive on sales and operations, not internet name-dropping.

i know you're curious so instead of teasing i'll just say: all of these kinds businesses are basically the same: think of something people or businesses pay money for, then do that. generally the business morphs as you get better / identify new opportunities. and you can grow it very large given enough time.

Re:Startup Playbook by icelancer on Friday November 06, 2015 @05:06AM (#10518631)
Yeah. There's no upside for me to share the name of the business. I would love to, but it's not in my best interest.
Re:Startup Playbook by forgetsusername on Friday November 06, 2015 @08:50AM (#10519393)
>* happy to be out of the BS VC silicon valley groupthink crap.*

If you have a 6 man company with titles like "President and Founder" and "CEO", you're buying into the SV groupthink a little.

Outside of SV, in the world of small/medium business (for which I've consulted), I don't think I've ever heard the title "CEO". Meanwhile, I've gone to tech conferences and have seen sole-proprietors refer to themselves as the CEO.

Re:Startup Playbook by icelancer on Sunday November 08, 2015 @11:50PM (#10531452)
We have to be named something. I am the Founder of the company. That is a no brainer. I am also the President, as I set the strategy for the company (this is traditionally what the President does).

I do not make 95% of executive leadership decisions. The CEO does. Which again, is the definition of the term.

So no, I am not buying into the SV groupthink. Just because other startups use VP/SVP/"manager" doesn't make it non-SV. They're just... correct terms.