News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on What are the most polarizing programming languages?. Parent comment

Re:What are the most polarizing programming languages? by MichaelGG on Wednesday November 04, 2015 @03:49PM (#10509605)
Did they have a full spec, or implementation though? It's not like getting the folks at Github upset is very difficult or truly reflecting controversy. Everyone I know that's read the underlying research (there is literally a researcher looking into what a "feminist" programming language would be, though the main pull from the published work was "what does this mean?").
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:What are the most polarizing programming languages? by fche on Thursday November 05, 2015 @09:39AM (#10513512)
c+equality was "implemented" as a macro package. (The response-to-parody hyperventilation went well beyond github.)
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:What are the most polarizing programming languages? by MichaelGG on Thursday November 05, 2015 @12:41PM (#10514787)
Got a link to other hyperventilation? All I noticed was that the "real" "feminist programming language" stuff now 404s. C+= was pretty masterful.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:What are the most polarizing programming languages? by fche on Sunday November 08, 2015 @07:51PM (#10530820)
C+= was hounded off many other public git hosting services, and even a few days ago when one reappeared, is was hounded anew. Much hard feeling amongst the parodied.
[ Parent | on HN ]