News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ten years ago Wikipedia was widely considered a doomed ex... by Ankaios on Monday November 02, 2015 @10:33AM (#10492317)
At least for my fields of interest, encyclopediae are never considered appropriate references for college student papers—Wikipedia is not exceptional in that regard.

That said, Wikipedia is untrustworthy. It's a great way to quickly learn about ideas and vocabulary in a field, but it's riddled with misconceptions, misinterpretations, deceptive slants, and other errors. It's important to treat it with a healthy dose of skepticism and base research work on original sources instead. Regardless, though, it's an amazing resource that I'm sure has accelerated research productivity at all levels.

Re:Ten years ago Wikipedia was widely considered a doomed ex... by ska on Monday November 02, 2015 @03:24PM (#10494913)

   It's a great way to quickly learn about ideas and vocabulary in a field, but it's riddled with misconceptions, misinterpretations, deceptive slants, and other errors.
In other words, it's an encyclopedia.
Re:Ten years ago Wikipedia was widely considered a doomed ex... by Ankaios on Tuesday November 03, 2015 @02:17AM (#10498057)
Quantity has a quality all its own, regarding both aspects.