News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ten years ago Wikipedia was widely considered a doomed ex... by josephmx on Monday November 02, 2015 @10:14AM (#10492165)
2 years ago it was banned in my sixth form still, but the sources at the bottom were allowed. The principle was "anyone can edit it, therefore only trust things with multiple sources". A reasonable policy really.
Re:Ten years ago Wikipedia was widely considered a doomed ex... by zeveb on Monday November 02, 2015 @10:57AM (#10492531)
> 2 years ago it was banned in my sixth form still, but the sources at the bottom were allowed.

That's a really good lesson about sources in general. One can't even trust a primary source, except as an indicator about what someone at close hand thought to write down; it and everything which references it will have biases, slant and perspective.

There is such a thing as truth, but it can only be approximated.

Re:Ten years ago Wikipedia was widely considered a doomed ex... by deelowe on Monday November 02, 2015 @11:59AM (#10493048)
Technically, that's always been the case for encyclopedias for any college serious about academics. You should cite the source, not the editorialized version of it.