News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Interview Humiliation.

Re:Interview Humiliation by Bigsy on Thursday October 29, 2015 @10:53AM (#10471442)
Why not name the company? I'm going to be honest..I don't think this actually happened.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Interview Humiliation by sjs382 on Thursday October 29, 2015 @01:04PM (#10472532)
Telling the name privately or in a casual conversation is one thing, publishing the name is one thing.

While I wish I knew the company's name (or knew their side of the story) I don't fault him for not sharing.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Interview Humiliation by albertoleal on Thursday October 29, 2015 @11:50AM (#10471963)
>Why not name the company?

I'm going to guess OP may be 'liable' for damaging the company's reputation.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Interview Humiliation by kelukelugames on Thursday October 29, 2015 @12:50PM (#10472429)
No, not liable if this is true. The recruiter being fired is easily provable. It will add weight to the rest of the story.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Interview Humiliation by pavornyoh on Thursday October 29, 2015 @11:01AM (#10471516)
>Why not name the company?

Perhaps fear? Maybe they don't want to become an object of ridicule

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Interview Humiliation by kelukelugames on Thursday October 29, 2015 @12:52PM (#10472441)
He was the object of ridicule.

Things cannot get worse for him unless the company is committed to ruining its reputation. Then again someone companies have been known to release personal information when threatened.

[ Parent | on HN ]