News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Timing attack against HSTS to sniff browser history in Ch... by meowface on Tuesday October 27, 2015 @01:25AM (#10456442)
Could you link some older sources discussing some of these leaks? I'm having trouble finding any. Not doubting you, since you're probably right; would just be interested in reading them.
Re:Timing attack against HSTS to sniff browser history in Ch... by bcrypt on Tuesday October 27, 2015 @04:08AM (#10456783)
[edit - just realized this may not answer the question you asked, which is leaks that take advantage of HSTS/HPKP/CSP. hopefully still useful info.]

I may write a blog post later about this, but here are a few that come to mind (only counting things that have demos or have been observed in the wild):

* css-visited browser history sniffing (fixed several years ago): http://dbaron.org/mozilla/visited-privacy * HSTS unique-subdomain combination supercookies: http://www.radicalresearch.co.uk/lab/hstssupercookies * lcamtuf's cache timing attack: http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/cachetime/ * webrtc local ip leak: https://diafygi.github.io/webrtc-ips/ * panopticlick: https://panopticlick.eff.org/ * evercookie: http://samy.pl/evercookie

Re:Timing attack against HSTS to sniff browser history in Ch... by ejcx on Tuesday October 27, 2015 @01:39AM (#10456477)
AFAIK most of that info is in HN and twitter discussions between webappsec people. Here's a link[0] to a CSP leak that was briefly discussed on the webappsec mailing list. I also know Homakov wrote one[1].

That's one of the reasons I like this talk so much. It really cemented these type of issue with real attacks, instead of a loosely described bunch of PoC. I remember reading somewhere on an RFC (perhaps CSP) that reporting can cause unwanted information leakage, but I didn't find it in the security considerations with a quick control+f just now.

[0] - https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webappsec/2015Ju...

[1] - http://homakov.blogspot.com/2014/01/using-content-security-p...

Re:Timing attack against HSTS to sniff browser history in Ch... by bcrypt on Tuesday October 27, 2015 @02:11AM (#10456550)
In addition to Egor's stuff, I'd recommend just reading the "Privacy and Security Considerations" sections of various RFC's and W3C specs. Lots of theoretical attacks in there that people simply haven't built demos for!

In case anyone's interested, slides are up at https://zyan.scripts.mit.edu/presentations/toorcon2015.pdf and talk recording at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kk2GkZv6Wjs

Re:Timing attack against HSTS to sniff browser history in Ch... by ejcx on Tuesday October 27, 2015 @02:22AM (#10456580)
like you said, the security considerations are mostly theoretical. It actually might seem basic turning it into a real attack but it requires a fair bit of work.

It is always my favorite section of the RFCs. Along with anywhere that says "The UA [MUST|MAY|...] \w+". Much fun to be had....

Re:Timing attack against HSTS to sniff browser history in Ch... by meowface on Tuesday October 27, 2015 @01:52AM (#10456500)
Ah, I feel silly now. I remember reading Egor's blog post on that last year.

Thanks.