News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Land-value tax: Why Henry George had a point by bryanlarsen on Saturday October 24, 2015 @12:00PM (#10443961)
What impoverishes the elderly is that silly notion of leaving a legacy to their children. Such a concept makes sense when you die at the age of 40, but it makes no sense for an 85 year old.

You're right that selling the big house and buying a small house makes sense for a lot of seniors, but taking away their ability to choose something like a reverse mortgage is just patronizing them.

Re:Land-value tax: Why Henry George had a point by JoeAltmaier on Sunday October 25, 2015 @09:46PM (#10449242)
Nobody is taking anything; they are operating in a free market and making their best choice, which may be to sell the big house and buy a smaller one in a cheaper neighborhood. If they choose instead to impoverish themselves, and they had all the information in front of them, then ok I guess.

But I imagine nobody in their right mind would deliberately go broke when other options were available. I imagine that folks that work hard to convince them to do such things, are not working in their favor.

Patronizing them would be, deciding that a reverse mortgage is always in their best interest.