Re:Land-value tax: Why Henry George had a point
by cm2187 on Saturday October 24, 2015 @07:08AM
(#10443202)
I agree but I don't think a tax would be needed where there is a strong housing supply crisis if planning restrictions are relaxed. Property developpers are already frenetically building residential skycrappers where they can in London.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Land-value tax: Why Henry George had a point
by mrec on Saturday October 24, 2015 @07:37AM
(#10443270)
You're not seriously holding up London as an example of a functioning housing market, are you?
Re:Land-value tax: Why Henry George had a point
by cm2187 on Saturday October 24, 2015 @07:56AM
(#10443321)
I am merely suggesting that in the areas where there are little planning restrictions, the developpers do build the much needed housing supply.
Re:Land-value tax: Why Henry George had a point
by twic on Saturday October 24, 2015 @04:49PM
(#10444814)
My point was that it's not enough to just build housing - you need to make sure the supply of public infrastructure increases accordingly. This is an existing problem in London, hence section 106 agreements and all that: