News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Land-value tax: Why Henry George had a point by ZenoArrow on Saturday October 24, 2015 @06:49AM (#10443172)
The skyscrapers do seem a bit out of place in London, but I wonder if that's just a temporary issue. I remember reading that there were similar objections to the Eiffel Tower in Paris around the time when it was built. Perhaps they only look out of place because you remember what it was like before, or perhaps they'll always stick out.

Are there limits placed on the heights of buildings in residential areas of London?

As for narrow streets, I'm glad they kept them. Compared to some other big cities London feels more 'human friendly' (for want of a better term), wide streets can make a place feel more car focused, less a place that feels like a destination and more somewhere you travel through to get to where you want to be. Dedicated bike lanes are the only changes worth making IMO, but you can create that by working with the existing roads so long as you reduce the demand for cars. It seems that the London Underground has been increasing in capacity over the past 10 years or so, hopefully that will continue.

Re:Land-value tax: Why Henry George had a point by paublyrne on Saturday October 24, 2015 @07:28AM (#10443248)
Tall buildings are not all bad.

Dublin has had strong restrictions on building height since the 1960s. An argument for this was to maintain the character of the city, although the destruction of many Georgian buildings was allowed by planners, on spurious health and safety grounds.

The worst effects of the policy were felt during and after the boom of the early 2000s, when accommodation was built further and further out from the city, leading to sprawl, and a commuter belt that stretched 100 kilometres in all directions, which put immense pressure on transport infrastructure. With so much construction, this represents in hindsight a missed opportunity to create more liveable centres or hubs in the style of London or other large cities.

Allowing taller structures for residential purposes in central city areas, would have improved Dublin's liveability. Instead, there is now a critical housing crisis that no one seems to know how to solve.

Re:Land-value tax: Why Henry George had a point by ZenoArrow on Saturday October 24, 2015 @07:40AM (#10443277)
What do you think of the ideas in this video:

http://youtu.be/Hy4QjmKzF1c

I believe it captures most of what is important in making a livable city that people enjoy living in.

Re:Land-value tax: Why Henry George had a point by cm2187 on Saturday October 24, 2015 @06:57AM (#10443186)
I am not a planning expert but my understanding is that pretty much the whole city is listed which means that the low rise houses can never be replaced. There are some areas that are not listed but then you have rules about panoramas, ie you need to be able to view certain monuments from many viewpoints, which creates an invisible web of max building height over London. As a result only a few spots can be built up.

As for the narrow streets, I am not questioning their charm, but they make transportation very slow, and therefore make it difficult to build out to compensate not builing up.

Re:Land-value tax: Why Henry George had a point by ZenoArrow on Saturday October 24, 2015 @07:26AM (#10443247)
This video captures quite a bit of what I consider important in city planning, would be interested to hear your thoughts on it:

http://youtu.be/Hy4QjmKzF1c

Re:Land-value tax: Why Henry George had a point by cm2187 on Saturday October 24, 2015 @07:54AM (#10443314)
I pretty much 100% agree with it. Except the 5 floors rule. Paris or Vienna are 7-8 floors. Upper manhattan is 10-12. And these do not feel particularly oppressive.

Tokyo is another interesting type of urbanism. You have very large avenues delimiting blocks. The blocks can either be residential, in which case you walk in what feels like a quiet little village with its narrow streets. Or they can be "entertainment", with a dense web of noisy bars, restaurants and game arcades, lots of light and people.

Re:Land-value tax: Why Henry George had a point by ZenoArrow on Saturday October 24, 2015 @09:47AM (#10443574)
I agree that the 5 floor rule doesn't make sense all the time, though the limits used should be linked to the width of the streets. I believe it's good to make sure sunlight can reach every window for at least part of the day, though there's a certain charm to some narrow side streets too.