News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Nim for scientific computing: Back to the future.

Re:Nim for scientific computing: Back to the future by approbatory on Wednesday October 21, 2015 @08:24PM (#10429757)
In the comparison with torch you are translating x:dot(y) as x * y, but it should be x.t() * y
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Nim for scientific computing: Back to the future by pathsjs on Thursday October 22, 2015 @04:26AM (#10431043)
No, it is right like that. In linalg, * on vectors is the scalar product. I have designed linalg to agree with mathematical conventions, rather than numpy conventions.
[ Parent | on HN ]