Re:YouTube Red, a $9.99 Site-Wide Ad-Free Subscription with ...
by coldpie on Wednesday October 21, 2015 @03:09PM
(#10427799)
Take it easy and wait for more info. All you've got to on is one line in a 3rd party news article.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:YouTube Red, a $9.99 Site-Wide Ad-Free Subscription with ...
by Blaaguuu on Wednesday October 21, 2015 @03:18PM
(#10427880)
This isn't the first time Youtube has dramatically changed their terms, and forced creators to basically accept them or leave, though... so it is pretty easy to assume the worst when it comes to Youtube.
Re:YouTube Red, a $9.99 Site-Wide Ad-Free Subscription with ...
by newjersey on Wednesday October 21, 2015 @03:42PM
(#10428083)
The way I understand it, you can still host your videos. You just won't get any revenues. That is completely fine by me.
Re:YouTube Red, a $9.99 Site-Wide Ad-Free Subscription with ...
by jahmed on Thursday October 22, 2015 @01:36AM
(#10430552)
Yeah it's Alphabet's site. You play by their rules. Don't like it? Well there's always other options.
Re:YouTube Red, a $9.99 Site-Wide Ad-Free Subscription with ...
by 6stringmerc on Wednesday October 21, 2015 @04:17PM
(#10428348)
I'm surprised Allred is back to HN[1] but I guess it's mostly to serve the ends of Glasswire.
Re:YouTube Red, a $9.99 Site-Wide Ad-Free Subscription with ...
by austenallred on Wednesday October 21, 2015 @09:54PM
(#10429987)
Lol, HN literally came out with the "avoid excessive negativity" rule later that day, but I admit HN is an often-bad habit I keep getting sucked into.
And as far as Grasswire goes, we're doing 500k uniques per month at this point, so even getting on the front page of HN wouldn't really move the needle for us. I mention it occasionally when I think it's relevant, but that's a tiny minority of my HN use.
Re:YouTube Red, a $9.99 Site-Wide Ad-Free Subscription with ...
by 6stringmerc on Wednesday October 21, 2015 @10:57PM
(#10430176)
Fair enough, but I'm pretty sure you missed the implication that I intended, as in you're perfectly fine with coming to HN as a source to assist with coming up with material for your readership. It sure felt like fishing for help the way you phrased the OP. While this response may be construed as negative, I'd prefer the categorization as "functionally cynical" because there is a difference.
Re:YouTube Red, a $9.99 Site-Wide Ad-Free Subscription with ...
by austenallred on Wednesday October 21, 2015 @11:25PM
(#10430239)
Oh, I see. No, generally I try to share what the people in our newsroom have learned instead of the other way around. My parent comment was genuine frustration. BTW, I don't see your comments as out of line or overly-negative at all.
Re:YouTube Red, a $9.99 Site-Wide Ad-Free Subscription with ...
by 6stringmerc on Thursday October 22, 2015 @10:33AM
(#10432454)
All good, yeah I can see how something really hot like this story would be great fodder both for your outlet, and the desire to get it right / accurate would be well served by consulting the HN massive. Keep on keepin' on sir.