Re:Dillo: A Tiny Graphical Web Browser
by guard-of-terra on Tuesday October 20, 2015 @02:31AM
(#10417743)
It's lightning fast. Makes you feel what you've lost with all the css+js.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Browsing could never be slower than what we had without modern CSS/JS: desktop applications. If you think we've lost anything (speed, convenience, whatever) with CSS/JS, then you don't remember (or willfully forgot) what the web was like in the 90s.
No, I remember the web from the modem days, and I'd be quite happy with pages from the modem era but loaded over 100Mbit Ethernet.
Re:Dillo: A Tiny Graphical Web Browser
by bananaoomarang on Tuesday October 20, 2015 @05:45AM
(#10418261)
But that was because we were all using dial up, now the problem is the processing power required to crunch the overly-abstracted CSS/js output of our huge and complex toolchains.
Re:Dillo: A Tiny Graphical Web Browser
by guard-of-terra on Tuesday October 20, 2015 @06:56AM
(#10418436)
It's not just processing power, it's all the round-trips and timeouts and social buttons delays.
Re:Dillo: A Tiny Graphical Web Browser
by gopowerranger on Tuesday October 20, 2015 @08:00AM
(#10418628)
And advertising.
Re:Dillo: A Tiny Graphical Web Browser
by guard-of-terra on Tuesday October 20, 2015 @08:29AM
(#10418728)
Dumb banners or text adverts would be pretty fast, but all that script-loaded, dynamically retargetted, real time bidded crap is pretty slow.
Re:Dillo: A Tiny Graphical Web Browser
by gopowerranger on Tuesday October 20, 2015 @01:59PM
(#10420690)
Except dumb banner and adverts are NOT pretty fast and a frequent cause of the spinner still running long after the page loads.
Re:Dillo: A Tiny Graphical Web Browser
by guard-of-terra on Tuesday October 20, 2015 @02:28PM
(#10420858)
Meaning they are not dumb enough.
Re:Dillo: A Tiny Graphical Web Browser
by gopowerranger on Tuesday October 20, 2015 @08:01AM
(#10418634)
Without which we wouldn't need all the processing power and 640K of memory really would be enough.