News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Processor Utilization Difference Between IBM AIX and Linu... by travem on Monday October 19, 2015 @05:37PM (#10415964)
I wonder if this may be attributable to the difference between a CPU bound versus an IO bound workload? I imagine CVS is doing a fair amount of IO, which on a laptop with local disk (and no competing workloads driving IO) may be able to handle pretty effectively.
Re:Processor Utilization Difference Between IBM AIX and Linu... by kpil on Tuesday October 20, 2015 @04:14PM (#10421517)
There were no competing workload and no virtualization on the AIX either. We didn't need it (yet) for other things.