Re:Probably Predatory – Barely Legally
by mpweiher on Sunday October 18, 2015 @03:18AM
(#10407482)
The underlying issue, IMHO, is that the AppStore has been designed in such a way that what Marco is doing is probably the sensible thing for him to do, as it only supports "hit-based" business models. Well, and scam-based ones.
Except that with software, such a hit-based model is even more skewed towards winner-takes-all than music is. So let's put the blame where the blame belongs: the ones creating the incentive structure, not the ones doing their best within that structure.
Re:Probably Predatory – Barely Legally
by dominicmauro on Sunday October 18, 2015 @09:59AM
(#10408234)
Author here. I agree entirely. Apple's pricing and discovery issues created this perverse incentive structure, and Marco's just responding to it. Competition under this system gets ugly.
Re:Probably Predatory – Barely Legally
by mpweiher on Sunday October 18, 2015 @06:29AM
(#10407792)
Because most people listen to more different songs than they have (or need) different apps. If I have one to do app and am happy with it, there is strong disincentive to buy/use a different one.
Whereas if I have one hit song, chances are I'll buy another one, there really isn't any disincentive.
Or put another way: count the number of apps (you use) vs. the number of songs you listen to.
Except that with software, such a hit-based model is even more skewed towards winner-takes-all than music is. So let's put the blame where the blame belongs: the ones creating the incentive structure, not the ones doing their best within that structure.
Whereas if I have one hit song, chances are I'll buy another one, there really isn't any disincentive.
Or put another way: count the number of apps (you use) vs. the number of songs you listen to.