News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Europe's love affair with diesel cars has been a disaster by playworker on Saturday October 17, 2015 @02:34PM (#10405493)
Twice as efficient, really? From what I can see you might get a few MPG more from a diesel but there's not that much difference. Modern petrol cars are returning 50-60 mpg, diesels maybe 70, both when driven with care obviously.

Diesels better in wet weather, really? I've never owned one, but neither have I ever had to leave my petrol car at home because it was raining, and I've owned some fairly old cars :)

Re:Europe's love affair with diesel cars has been a disaster by dghughes on Sunday October 18, 2015 @01:05PM (#10408845)
Modern gasoline engines are supposedly 25% efficient the remaining 75% lost as heat. Modern turbo-diesel engines are again supposedly 50% efficient with the other 50% heat loss. I don't have specific stats just what I've heard over the years.

Not to be antagonistic but what gasoline engines which are not a hybrid get (US or Imperial) 50 to 60mpg? I could see diesel engine vehicle average mileage for small manual transmission getting high Imperial 60mpg gas maybe high 40s mpg.

Deep water and gasoline engine don't tend to work well, and in my region snow gets under the hood then melts (can't get it all out) which causes problems.

Compared to a gas engine a diesel engine will run underwater if it has air you see 4x4 trucks with snorkels on the A-pillar (and some other sealing) in Africa countries, Australia and military use too.

Re:Europe's love affair with diesel cars has been a disaster by egroat on Saturday October 17, 2015 @03:23PM (#10405679)
I find twice to be relatively outrageous, but both my mother and I having the same car (Toyota Yaris) from the same year with mine being a diesel and hers petrol the following is noticeable:

* I get about 1.25x the mpg in the diesel to her in the petrol. 1.5x compared to myself in the petrol (no mpg quotes because it depends on the type of driving)

* The torque is useful. I drive a 30 minute commute, mainly motorway. If I drive hers it is a noticably worse drive.

* For in town driving hers feels better every time. Easier to handle with no load (hauling something? Use the diesel), the diesel tricks me into speeding.

* Wet weather? Never had weather problems in either car.

So whilst I am definitely a less efficient driver than her I save a significant amount on fuel by having a diesel, and my calculation shows its several hundred a year better than if I had bought the petrol when I had the chance - more than covering the increased cost of the initial purchase.

Re:Europe's love affair with diesel cars has been a disaster by usaar333 on Saturday October 17, 2015 @03:04PM (#10405612)
50+ mpg? What non-hybrid is that fuel efficient? I've seen almost none that beat even 40 combined city/highway
Re:Europe's love affair with diesel cars has been a disaster by playworker on Saturday October 17, 2015 @03:20PM (#10405665)
I know there's some sort of VW reputation issue with fuel economy these days ;) but something like the latest Golf as an example of a "normal" car (you need to expand the Fuel Consumption category to see the numbers: http://www.volkswagen.co.uk/new/golf-vii/which-model/engines...
Re:Europe's love affair with diesel cars has been a disaster by andrewaylett on Saturday October 17, 2015 @03:42PM (#10405755)
US vs. Imperial gallons? That gets you 20%.
Re:Europe's love affair with diesel cars has been a disaster by usaar333 on Sunday October 18, 2015 @03:45AM (#10407521)
ya, that explains the issue. GP's gallons are bigger than the ones I am thinking of