News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:YC Continuity by vm on Thursday October 15, 2015 @04:22PM (#10395730)
How will you manage negative signaling?

i.e. YC leads a growth round for Company A, but not for Company B. Ergo, VCs think Company B isn't worth funding.

Re:YC Continuity by sama on Thursday October 15, 2015 @04:27PM (#10395768)
The main thing we're doing here is not making any discretionary bets on companies until they're far enough along to be valued off of an Excel model. At that stage, signaling matter much much less.
Re:YC Continuity by vasilipupkin on Thursday October 15, 2015 @09:47PM (#10397046)
Is there a subtle conflict of interest with YC essentially benefiting from lower early round valuations, whereas before this was not the case, e.g. YC and startups were aligned on valuation