Re:Counterintuitive economics of a chess tournament
by CJefferson on Wednesday October 14, 2015 @06:21AM
(#10385844)
How does having a women prize kill competition exactly? There is an overall prize for everyone to compete for. A 'best man' prize would, in every chess tournament I'm aware of every happening, always go to the best player anyway. The day a woman wins the top prize, the is the day we could introduce a 'top man' prize.
And why single out the women prize, as opposed to the over 65 or under 13 prizes?
And why single out the women prize, as opposed to the over 65 or under 13 prizes?