News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Could Li-Fi be the new Wi-Fi? [video] by dogma1138 on Tuesday October 13, 2015 @02:58PM (#10382648)
You don't need separated routers each LED light bulb can be used as an access point, there are already LED bulbs with WiFi because people will buy anything that looks like an Apple product.

You need WiFi still because the LiFi channel is only one way.

It can still sorta work through some pockets but rule of thumb is that if your mobile device is in your pocket you don't need the fastest speed possible and you can fallback to WiFi.

But yeah the tech is kinda silly in general.

Re:Could Li-Fi be the new Wi-Fi? [video] by xnzakg on Tuesday October 13, 2015 @05:27PM (#10383613)
> You don't need separated routers each LED light bulb can be used as an access point

But you need to buy one that supports LiFi, and LiFi bulbs will probably be more expensive than normal lightbulbs (if they become a thing)

And if you still need WiFi, what's the point of buying LiFi bulbs and setting them up when you can just keep using WiFi? It just doesn't seem to be worth it unless you're in a place with hundreds of WiFi devices (and it still probably won't help a lot).

Re:Could Li-Fi be the new Wi-Fi? [video] by dogma1138 on Tuesday October 13, 2015 @05:54PM (#10383757)
You would have to buy special light bulbs anyhow, you won't be able to use a commercial of the shelf bulb for this no matter what the BBC thinks.

The LED's need to be able to turn on and off in nano-seconds so you can't just twitch the AC power because the voltage regulator will not respond fast enough (there is enough juice in the capacitors to drive the LED's for a few seconds usually this is why cheap LED light bulbs don't turn off straight away, the more expensive ones have usually have a current shunt that will clear the capacitors to ground when you hit the light switch) and most likely simply die after a few minutes.

So you need to do in-circuit modulation which means a dedicated light bulb.

Well in theory you start building light bulbs that can be effectively turned on and off about about a billion times a second which is not going to happen and even then you'll still need some device that will modulate the light so instead of a dedicated light bulb you'll have a dedicated lamp.

Considering the engineering limitations and the cost involved having normal light bulbs that can connect to your network via either WiFi or well via basically "DSL" via sending a phase modulated signal over the AC wiring in your house similar to how those power plug Ethernet / WiFi extenders work.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power-line_communication

Again this is a very kickstarter / TED talk worthy idea that sounds brilliant but it will probably go the way of the GyroJet because it's just so dumb on so many levels.