News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Global coalition tells Facebook to kill its Real Names po... by mikeash on Tuesday October 13, 2015 @07:37AM (#10379719)
I do think that legislation should be avoided if it's not necessary. If complaining or boycotting gets the job done, then that should be the first option. I'll never understand people who think we shouldn't complain or boycott. Surely this is just an exercise of one's right to free association? (Not saying you're objecting to them. But a lot of people seem to think that it's somehow wrong.)

On the other hand, if an issue is important and legislation can get the job done, we shouldn't shy away from it. To describe someone as "a perverse sadist" for wanting to legislate pseudonyms on social networks is bonkers.

Re:Global coalition tells Facebook to kill its Real Names po... by minority-one on Wednesday October 14, 2015 @10:52AM (#10386926)
> I do think that legislation should be avoided if it's not necessary.

In other words: if legislation.necessary? then enact else avoid.

> On the other hand, if an issue is important and legislation can get the job done, we shouldn't shy away from it.

In other words: if issue.important? and legislation.effective? then enact else avoid.

These two are contradictory. Which is it for you?

Re:Global coalition tells Facebook to kill its Real Names po... by mikeash on Wednesday October 14, 2015 @09:06PM (#10390685)
"Shouldn't shy away" does not equate to "always do it."