Re:Plumbum: A lazy, constant-memory streaming data Rust library
by startling on Sunday October 11, 2015 @05:00AM
(#10368618)
Are duplicate library names a problem? It should be clear from context (Python vs Rust) which one people mean, and it seems unreasonable to expect people to continue creating unique names indefinitely.
Re:Plumbum: A lazy, constant-memory streaming data Rust library
by kzrdude on Sunday October 11, 2015 @08:49AM
(#10369088)
We have one namespace in the Rust community to adhere to, and that's the crates.io namespace, where packages have to have unique names. I think that's all you need to watch out for realistically.
Re:Plumbum: A lazy, constant-memory streaming data Rust library
by mockery on Sunday October 11, 2015 @02:26PM
(#10370338)
Yeah, it wasn't until I read your comment that I realized that 'Kleisli' was documented. I suspect I've been making a similar mistake any time I peruse Rust documentation. (I don't write any Rust myself, or I assume I'd have figured it out by now.)
Is the involvement of a Kleisli arrow strictly necessary?
Would it help if I clarified that somewhere, or would you rather not read "Kleisli" anywhere in the docs?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eMJk4y9NGvE