News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Mercury Spill by rbobby on Friday October 09, 2015 @07:56AM (#10359437)
The underlying problem is that insurance companies are allowed to segment their customer base by risk. For low risk customers this is great because they get a cheap rate. For the companies it's great because they get to advertise a cheap rate and attract customers (and run really lean administratively... don't need a lot of claims handlers etc).

Things go off the rails though for customers perceived as high risk. Grouping all these folks together means a higher rate, possibly quite a bit higher.

The use of prior claim history as a risk measurement seems like a very cheap way to do underwriting. This feeds into being able to offer the cheapest offering... no need for experienced and qualified underwriters... which means a cheaper product.

The original goal of insurance, shared risked, has been somewhat eroded by this.

Re:Mercury Spill by logingone on Friday October 09, 2015 @08:46AM (#10359623)
Isn't the problem that the government, which is supposed to uphold justice, let's it go on?
Re:Mercury Spill by radu_floricica on Sunday October 11, 2015 @07:17AM (#10368928)
What's justice got to do with anything? Insurance is a service, offered by a private entity to a private entity. You pay more in insurance than you're expected to pay for damages over a lifetime, but you get the peace of mind that comes from knowing you're not going to be bankrupt by an accident.

Sure, most industries benefit from a bit of regulation, but from that to "justice" is a long road.

Re:Mercury Spill by dietrichepp on Saturday October 10, 2015 @03:28AM (#10364810)
That's an interesting twist.