Re:Jaws: The Serverless Framework
by ac360 on Thursday October 08, 2015 @08:43AM
(#10352317)
I understand this concern. This is where JAWS comes in. The best way to do Lambda development, is to make AWS Lambda a thin wrapper around your own separate code, to keep that code re-usable, testable and AWS independent.
JAWS generates scaffolding to encourage this for you. As a result, your code ends up looking just like a traditional application framework's code.
I just did a talk on JAWS @ Re:Invent to over 600 people. The line was out the door. Honestly, I didn't hear "I'm only going to use this for a hackathon project" once, except for now. Instead, all I heard was, "OMG we don't have to deal with servers!!! We will use this for everything!!!". And there were huge enterprise companies there.
I'm a Docker lover, but Lambda has a huge head start in many areas. Super fast spin-up times, orchestration handled for you, the ability to containerize functions/endpoints not just applications, and pay per use pricing. All of this comes with Lambda out-of-the-box.
JAWS generates scaffolding to encourage this for you. As a result, your code ends up looking just like a traditional application framework's code.
I just did a talk on JAWS @ Re:Invent to over 600 people. The line was out the door. Honestly, I didn't hear "I'm only going to use this for a hackathon project" once, except for now. Instead, all I heard was, "OMG we don't have to deal with servers!!! We will use this for everything!!!". And there were huge enterprise companies there.
I'm a Docker lover, but Lambda has a huge head start in many areas. Super fast spin-up times, orchestration handled for you, the ability to containerize functions/endpoints not just applications, and pay per use pricing. All of this comes with Lambda out-of-the-box.