- States already had educational standards
- There was already tremendous interest in improving those standards
- English, science, and math work the same way in every state
- States already had a lot of experience with harmonizing standards, such as the Uniform Commercial Codes
Even today, with all the "controversy", the vast majority of states adhere to the Common Core, and even the states that don't, have essentially the same standards with a different name.
So, there's really no reason to call this the Gates Foundation "buying control" of public schools.
edit: clarity
They are billionaires. And this was only a $1.5 million dollar donation, so how many can they afford to buy this way? I'm thinking it's enough to have a real impact on higher education in the U.S.
Koch is definitely having a impact on higher education, look at all the major universities he is involved in.
It's very easy to turn to freedom as an argument and people making the choice, when education is finely tuned to shape said people.
Huh, that's surprisingly overt. Donations for things like endowed chairs or new buildings usually assumed to have an influence, as institutions don't like to offend potential sources of money. But it's rarely as direct as the donor actually getting to vet faculty hires. If the linked article [1] is correct, sounds pretty openly like an attempt by a private individual to literally buy control of part of a public institution.
[1] http://www.tampabay.com/news/business/billionaires-role-in-h...