News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Intel Added Cache Partitioning by dunkelheit on Monday October 05, 2015 @07:21PM (#10335704)
To me putting high-priority low-latency process and a low-priority high-throughput process on the same machine is a recipe for disaster - they will find some way to get entangled and hurt each other. Kudos to google for pulling this out but the article shows that you need expertise on all levels of the stack to attempt this. Most of us are better off with simply buying more boxes :)
Re:Why Intel Added Cache Partitioning by kozyraki on Tuesday October 06, 2015 @12:41AM (#10336786)
Or we can automate this in an OS/cluster manager and safely this with everyone like we do with some many other technologies that are difficult for most of us to develop :)
Re:Why Intel Added Cache Partitioning by dunkelheit on Tuesday October 06, 2015 @08:57AM (#10338506)
One can dream... Of course having this available as an opensource technology would be great but for now it is a piece of proprietary tech inside google.