Re:Ask HN: How can we use technology to prevent domestic mas...
by gmuslera on Sunday October 04, 2015 @08:57PM
(#10329467)
You are asking for precrime. Is ripe for abuse, and will be badly abused. Less technology (as in "weapons", the availability of lethal ones and the culture about having/using them) is more probable that have an impact.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ask HN: How can we use technology to prevent domestic mas...
by notoriginal on Sunday October 04, 2015 @09:21PM
(#10329525)
I am not necessarily asking for thoughtcrime, if that's what you mean. Technology is ripe for benefits and abuse. It's all about the manner in which it is used. For example, can we use sensors and networking on mobile devices to create a distributed system to reliably detect traces of bomb chemicals in the air?
Re:Ask HN: How can we use technology to prevent domestic mas...
by gmuslera on Sunday October 04, 2015 @11:42PM
(#10329870)
Pre-crime, like in Minority Report, predicting somewhat that someone "will" commit a crime and jail him before it does. Even if he wasn't going to do it, or was just incriminated.
Regarding bomb chemicals or helper devices, most mass killing were using guns that god forbids if you complain about someone having the right to have them. And you can make bombs with common household items (i.e. cleaning products) and use i.e. pressure cookers as devices. The possibility of false possitives, or even discretionary false possitives is too big.
And still will remain the problem that you are giving even more power to the ones that do that control. No one watches the watchers.