I Do Not Want Your Stupid App

Re:I Do Not Want Your Stupid App by SCdF on Saturday October 03, 2015 @02:02PM (#10324753)

See, I agree, but this is what this article looks like on my phone: https://imgur.com/VqchKIp

Perhaps one should become a good example of an enjoyable mobile experience before one starts throwing stones.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I Do Not Want Your Stupid App by Bahamut on Saturday October 03, 2015 @02:09PM (#10324785)

Installing an app for everything is not what I call an enjoyable mobile experience...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I Do Not Want Your Stupid App by SCdF on Saturday October 03, 2015 @02:41PM (#10324909)

Sorry, not sure if I was clear. What I meant was: Techcrunch shouldn't proudly point out that everyone else is making reading on a mobile device unenjoyable by asking if you want to install an app, because they themselves crap so much non-content on your screen and make their own mobile experience an unenjoyable one.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I Do Not Want Your Stupid App by pjbrunet on Saturday October 03, 2015 @02:12PM (#10324795)

Try Opera with user agent desktop?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I Do Not Want Your Stupid App by minimaxir on Saturday October 03, 2015 @02:25PM (#10324855)

TechCrunch now has a responsive layout, so forcing a desktop user agent does nothing.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I Do Not Want Your Stupid App by pjbrunet on Sunday October 04, 2015 @03:42AM (#10326815)

I see your point. Above the fold I get two banner ads and a pile of poop in Opera.

[ Parent | on HN ]