Re:Foundations of probability theory
by d9fb698e010974b on Friday October 02, 2015 @02:31PM
(#10320360)
Well you can just read the reviews to see that the Durrett text isn't well regarded while others like Chung's are. And the criticism about a probability space not being a sample space is correct, but I think it's clear what Tao meant there, namely that the sample space would be a part of a probability space.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Foundations of probability theory
by keithpeter on Friday October 02, 2015 @03:27PM
(#10320684)
Thanks
The Amazon UK reviews of Chung's book lead me to A Probability Path by Sidney Resnick which appears to be aimed at non-mathematicians. I have invested (speaking as a renegade physicist lacking a systematic exploration of measure theory).