Now, unless they choose just to not pay out, they can still reduce their risk levels below threshold of the industry. That's what actuarial science is founded on.
Oh, you mean "that branch of science that everyone ignores because it's politically unpalatable?"
"Gee, we promised the moon for our pension obligations and funded them at an absurdly low level, and now we're bankrupt? I don't know how this could have happened!" ~ Municipal governments
Yes, the pool is not always large enough, so you can throw it into a reinsurer from the insurance company. Yes, the reinsurance pool isn't always large enough, so you can retrocede to a few other reinsurers for diversification.
That pool isn't aways large enough, so you can securitise away the tail risks and aggregate loss risks into a cat bond, or a pandemic bond, or a longevity swap, or something fun.
These will then in turn be bought up by pension companies, in order to diversify against their market risks, and the needle returns to the start of the song, and we all sing along like before.
The problem is that you can't eliminate risk[1][2], you can only shift it to someone else. But, we now live in a time in which people with the most powerful computers can shift all of the risk away from them. Consider where that risk ends up getting shifted.
[1] http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?YouCantEliminateRisk
[2] Well, science probably does eliminate risk and uncertainty, but that's a totally different enterprise.