Re:Study: Some car models consuming around 50% more fuel tha...
by slasaus on Wednesday September 30, 2015 @09:45AM
(#10303872)
I was thinking of voting machines as well and think publicly verifiable code and hardware would be a good thing for cars (I don't think it's good enough for large scale elections, but that's another topic).
See this story about the need for open source for large publicly used systems: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/23/nyregion/volkswagens-diese...
Re:Study: Some car models consuming around 50% more fuel tha...
by slasaus on Wednesday September 30, 2015 @11:52AM
(#10304810)
ps. just reading this in a post from Bruce Schneier[1] that is currently on the frontpage as well[2] which is about cheating software as used by car manufacturers and the IoT that is coming up:
Voting machines could appear to work perfectly --
except during the first Tuesday of November, when it
undetectably switches a few percent of votes from one
party's candidates to another's.
[1] https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2015/09/volkswagen_an...
Re:Study: Some car models consuming around 50% more fuel tha...
by aleh on Wednesday September 30, 2015 @11:29AM
(#10304652)
The only problem is that hardware to verify ECU code is an actual car of particular model with equipment to analyse exhaust. Or very precise mathematical model of it which would be much more expensive and would probably require super-computer to run.
There are some markets, like voting machines, where requiring open, buildable, verifiable code is good practice. Cars might be another.