News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Intel's "cripple AMD" function. Parent comment

Re:Intel's "cripple AMD" function by rbanffy on Sunday January 03, 2010 @11:24PM (#1029759)
AMD voluntarily entered the desktop processor business, IIRC, at a time the US government required a second source before they could buy x86 chips. How does that make anti-competitive behaviour from a company many times their size nice?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Intel's "cripple AMD" function by anc2020 on Monday January 04, 2010 @03:57PM (#1031232)
It is anti-competitive to sell anything at a loss.
[ Parent | on HN ]